When the 15″ MacBook Pro was introduced, I told everyone that I will not upgrade yet. However, I was not able to resist the call of new technology! (read: technolust! hehe) so I ended up treating myself for a birthday present and got a MacBook Pro four days before the new MacBooks were announced.
Yesterday, a significant MacBook Pro upgrade was introduced by Apple by replacing the Core Duo processor with the new Core 2 Duo processor. The C2D has better performance/watt and also higher L2 cache (double!). Not only that, as Alan has pointed out, it is full 64-bit! Nice, eh?
Whilst it would have been great if I had a money tree, unfortunately upgrades need to be planned carefully (otherwise, my wife will kill me! hehehe). Tempting features but are they enough to make it worth the jump? For those who are waiting for the new Merom chips, by all means, get the new MacBook Pros! It will be worth it! For the CD-based MacBook Pro owners, unless you can sell your units now and then get the C2D ones, I’d recommend that you wait til Spring 2007. Why?
1. Core 2 Duo is far better. This is no contest. The new processor is indeed better. However, Anandtech has shown that this Core 2 Duo is not (yet) a significant upgrade from the current Core Duo system even with double its L2 cache!
At least until Intel releases Santa Rosa with an 800MHz frontside bus (FSB) speed, C2D is like a Ferrari on EDSA (fast car, congested road). Not to forget, Santa Rosa will come with 1GB NAND memory and Nokia’s HSDPA, too! Who knows? Intel might bundle WiMAX or IEEE 802.11n (hopefully ratified by H1 2007) and force Apple to release Airport Super Extreme!
2. Battery Life. The C2D supposedly has better power management. Again, as Anandtech has shown, improvement over power consumption is not that significant. Maybe with the faster FSB and perhaps better battery technology, the next crop of machines might last more than 8 hours on a single charge.
3. Firewire 800. Well, I had FW800 on my Powerbook but no FW800 device to connect it to. IMHO, useless for me. So not enough to compel me to upgrade.
4. More RAM, more HDD. Well, it is always a good thing to have more RAM and bigger HDD capacity on the base model. However, my 2GB maxed out MacBook Pro is enough for my needs. HDD capacity is another matter, though. I am looking for a larger and faster (7200rpm) HDD (know where I can find one?). For the meantime, my 2×250GB external FW400 drives will do.
5. Dual Layer Superdrive. The speed increase is definitely a plus. Whilst dual-layer is a good thing, the media is still expensive. I have 8X dual-layer on my Powerbook and I barely used it. Frankly, I think I just used it to backup my Mac OS X and iLife installer DVDs and that were it. I still have 2 dual-layer disks here but until I find a good enough data to burn, it will remain as blanks.
Besides, next year, Apple might release SuperDuper drives that support both Blu-Ray and HD-DVD disks.
6. 64-bit. Well, this is also a good thing. However, until software can take advantage of this architecture, it will be useless.
Imagine driving along the German Autobahn on a bicycle (yeah, I know this is not allowed)! Whilst it will take you to your destination, the fact that you can drive in excess of 100 kilometers per hour on the Autobahn, a faster vehicle would have been better. Mac OS X 10.4 support 64-bit however, Leopard (10.5) will provide better full 64-bit support from top to bottom or bottom to top, whichever is your fancy.
So come my next birthday this Spring 2007, I might just gift myself with a new MacBook Pro. If only the MacBooks come with its own video card and illuminated keyboard.
Technorati Tags: mac, merom